I went to to my niece Stephanie’s wedding in November and they gave us a free copy of the Oregonian at the place where we stayed. I didn’t read it at the time and then it sat around my house for weeks unread. I read an article about teachers that basically said that we are not getting good teachers because people don’t respect the profession enough as shown by the amount of money we pay them and the constant bad mouthing they get.
But the part I saved, after I skimmed the rest, was an article in the editorial section by Robert Ellis Gordon called The Nation’s Soul. The moral questions came first for Bobby Kennedy, and they should to us. It was related to the tax cuts for the wealthy.
My son has given me the same sentiment at times and he and I agreed with the opinion expressed by Gordon. “…the very first question(s) Bobby Kennedy would have asked…would be: Would extensions of the tax cuts be moral? Would it be moral for yet another child in the inner city to be bitten in the face by a rat while the wealthiest one percent received a second opportunity to go shopping for yachts courtesy of the U.S. Congress? Would it be moral for yet another infant in the Mississippi Delta to starve to death while the wealthiest 1 percent get another opportunity to purchase, perhaps a third yacht?” (or a second home or a third home and a third car etc.)
Gordon wondered why no one was asking about the inequity, lack of fairness, the simple right or wrong as well as about the human toll. He pleads with his fellow journalists to ask the moral questions first and the political questions second. I agree.
I ask if it’s moral to allow our children to go to poor schools in poor drug infested neighborhoods. Is it moral to take away needed services to the poor rather than raise taxes on the wealthy. Is it moral to worry more about the defense budget than American families and their children? Is it moral to complain about runaway government spending, while cutting taxes for the rich and adding $700 billion to the nation debt while saying we need to cut spending. And of course defense spending is off the table. We have to make sure the big defense contractors make billions at the expense of the American people.
My son and I expected that President Obama would ask these questions, but he hasn’t. He needs to make his leadership one that takes on the right over moral issues. The right is always talking about moral right or wrong while ignoring Jesus’ teaching to love one another. He promised justice to the poor and said, “… it is harder for a rich man to get into heaven than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle.” It’s time to we take on the Republicans on the moral issues instead of letting them act like they have the moral high ground when all the time they show no inclination to love their neighbor unless he/she is rich.
stephen pasquini says
Right on Dad!
Stephen Pasquini says
What’s this? A comment! I figured you’d like this one and didn’t mind me saying you agreed.
Benjamin Dobler says
I completely agree with you. I think the main issue though is the lack of transparency. If you take more taxes from the wealthier stratas of the population, they should be able to see that it’s going to something worthwhile and not getting squandered in the administration somewhere. These taxes should go directly into a programme to fund education, or inner city poverty… to fund certain and visible projects. And if it helps, the people in this financial braket should get a quarterly newsletter like any other charity, finding out where and how their money is being used. The problem with taxes is that they fall into the big pot, and no one ever sees the money again. And the wealthy won’t ever see it in action, because they are not living and working on those levels. Simply raising taxes will leave a bitter aftertaste in everyone’s mouth. I think we know enough about marketing and charity to be able to sweeten the pill.
Duke Pasquini says
Ben, you’re right. If we’re going to tax the wealthy, as we should, then we should tell them where it’s going and give them a spending statement. Although I doubt if it would make any difference, because for a lot of them it’s just greed because they already have more than they need and they want more. Taxes on those making over $400,000 in the 1950’s was 94%. It’s now only 36% and they’re screaming like made. Besides most of them have tons of deductions while average middle class folks don’t even itemize.
Nick says
I am finishing up a blog entry of my own on the morality of the budget process in Ohio (and stumbled across this!) I couldn’t agree me that we need to start asking moral questions about the budget, because it is a moral document. Research continues to show that the myth that tax cuts will increase economic activity has been proven false time and time again. Many people of faith are concerned about hunger and other social issues, but fail to realize that between government efforts account for almost 90% of investment in anti-poverty programs. The churches can’t fix this alone. The cuts to food stamps proposed in the Paul Ryan budget would cost $50,000 a year for 10 years for EVERY house of worship in the United States–just to make up for the cuts to SNAP (Food Stamps).